Coal-fired Congress Blocks Path to Clean Energy

View Trip Van Noppen's blog posts
16 December 2009, 4:06 PM
U.S. leadership on global warming threatened by compromise in Congress
A coal-fired power plant.

Becoming a grandfather is cause for celebration, unless you're a coal-fired power plant.

Coal plants that predate the Clean Air Act have become the mules of air pollution—set in their ways and not liable to change. Exploiting their "grandfathered" status, these coal plants have refused to implement technologies that are currently available to reduce pollution.

Now, Congress seems determined to let these dinosaurs off the hook all over again.

Although the Environmental Protection Agency's recent Clean Air Act endangerment finding prescribes a strong antidote to global warming pollution—a fact President Obama will surely highlight tomorrow on the final day of climate negotiations in Copenhagen—a political compromise over coal plants threatens to bind EPA's hands just as it begins to act.

The endangerment finding, based on overwhelming scientific evidence, says that global warming pollutants like carbon dioxide threaten human health and welfare. As a result, the Clean Air Act requires EPA to reduce global warming pollution from a wide range of sources, including cars, factories, and perhaps most importantly, coal-fired power plants.

Coal-fired power plants account for more than a third of U.S. global warming pollution, and as MIT researchers recently concluded, any credible solution to global warming must address emissions from these existing facilities. Period. The Clean Air Act is a powerful tool to do so, and it has in the past successfully reduced harmful pollutants.

But some legislators, feeling the heat from industry (not the planet), struck a deal as part of the American Clean Energy and Security Act—a cap-and-trade bill narrowly passed in June 2009 by the House of Representatives—that restricts EPA's regulatory power under the existing Clean Air Act. If adopted in a final law, the deal would make grandfathers of the 600-plus existing coal plants in the United States, allowing them to take a pass on new technology that would reduce global warming pollution.

It's imperative that this doesn't happen, and we're working hard to ensure a Senate bill leaves the Clean Air Act intact. To those tempted to believe that new authorities Congress is considering in global warming legislation are in some way incompatible with tools currently provided by the Clean Air Act, nothing could be further from the truth.

A cap on global warming pollution and the Clean Air Act work in complementary fashion. The cap sets an economy-wide limit on global warming pollution that decreases over time. Meanwhile, we need to constantly improve fuel efficiency standards for cars and use the Clean Air Act to zero in on other large sources of pollution like coal-fired power plants to ensure they also rapidly reduce emissions.

In other words: The cap is the floodlight. The Clean Air Act is the laser pointer.

Without the Clean Air Act emissions standards, a cap has too much risk of leaking. Dirty coal plants will continue to operate and pollute unchallenged for 15 years or more, stifling the growth of a clean energy economy and jeopardizing the possibility of achieving mid-term and long-term targets for reducing pollution.

And let's not forget that we made this mistake in the past, with troubling consequences. Before the Clean Air Act passed in 1970, legislators struck a deal with industry in which existing coal plants were "grandfathered" under the new law, meaning the facilities were not required to adopt modern controls to cut down on air pollution. The logic was that the antiquated plants—called "clunkers" by some—would soon close their doors and cap their smokestacks for good.

But logic failed. The loophole actually encouraged coal plant operators to extend the life of old, dirty plants, many of which are still operating today.

We don't have time to make this mistake again, and we shouldn't give coal plants a perverse incentive to continue polluting at the expense of clean energy, our health and the planet. It's time to move towards a clean energy future, and like it or not, coal-fired grandfathers just aren't a part of it.
 

Comments

Very informative and trustworthy blog. Please keep updating with great posts like this one. I have booked marked your site and am about to email it to a few friends of mine that I know would enjoy reading omegle sohbet
Thanks for sharing the information dude. I found the information very helpful. That's a awesome article you posted. I will come back to read some more. Energy
US still has a lot of work to do in the issue of global warming. It should start with switching to alternative sources of energy, which are low cost, and environmental friendly, like wind power, for example. Many European countries have started to use it and the results are excellent.
I absolutely will not vote for anyone who votes against legislation which will help stop or curb emissions. I'm an independent voter and it's time we listened to the scientists and pay attention to data. Ask who these congressmen and women get their campaign contributions from and who they are beholden to. I'm also a Christian who considers this earth a gift from God to us. It is absolutely appalling to me that so many who consider themselves Christians will not think twice about polluting as they continue to fight any reversal or restriction of their "right" to operate their businesses for profits at the earths expense. Maybe that comment doesn't belong here, but if you examine your personal beliefs and see that your business operations don't match them, maybe it's time you should do something about it.
I agree completely we need to get organized on this matter and let these civil servants know that their job depends upon their actions. If they don't do what we elected them to do we need to fire them. I long for the day when we can boast a coalition strong enough to influence things like this.
We humans have the capacity to create Paradise on Earth, but our greed and ignorance seem to overide Reality. Whether we are talking Health Care, Pollution, War - anything where big money is concerned, the mega-corporations roll out the same worn out propaganda and people who know nothing about the subject are soon yelling "Socialism!" "Marxism!" "Taxes!" to anyone who opposes the mega-corporations, even though they know nothing about economics, socialism or Marxism. These people are trained to ignore science and even observable evidence and only accept what comes out of the mouths of the right wing zealots who are regularly caught either lying or wrong. I think their followers become more rabid when the propagandists are caught lying or completely ignoring reality because they don't want to believe they've been used as dupes empowering those who are ripping them off. So they cling ferociously to even the wildest hair-brained lies because if they don't they are afraid they will have to admit they might have been wrong. Hopefully, something or sombody will wake them up before their kids are born with respitory problems or develop higher and higher rates of cancer because they will have only themselves to blame.
"So they cling ferociously to even the wildest hair-brained lies because if they don't they are afraid they will have to admit they might have been wrong. Hopefully, something or sombody will wake them up before their kids are born with respitory problems or develop higher and higher rates of cancer because they will have only themselves to blame." It is not the people who stop the progress of changes to correct the damage done to the environment...it is the 'elected officials' and 'government employees' who perhaps are on the take or at least they receive instant gratification of 'bringing business to the area'...they are the ones disobeying the existing laws and making 'arrangements' with those who want to make a dollar at the expense of the population. Unless these governmental employees are discharged from their obligations and stopped from making 'secret' arragements and carrying them on behind closed doors not allowing the citizens to participate in the deliberation of the desicions made but impose their power and intimidate the press not to publish the cries to stop the pollution...we are screaming to the wind. It is not the people (taxpayers) it is the 'hired help' who enrich themselves at the expense of ruining our world! Documented proof of the years of pollution and loss of personal funds at a time of recession to stop the damage that is done 'daily' to our resources! Good Luck! Take them out!
Personally, I find it hard to deny the negative effects of coal-fired power plants. By contributing 1/3 of the total CO2 output, plus sulphur dioxide and huge amounts of carbon monoxide, and particulates; they are a blight on the planet and a major cause of acid rain. We have the technology, and green power production capacity to replace these dinosaurs over time, or at the very least conserve more and rapidly deploy new clean technology while they are phased out. Change will not come cheap, but not changing rapidly will be enormously expensive. Already, the Aspens are dying in Colorado, the Oaks in California, and the Pines around the Midwest. Changes to the polar ice caps are undeniable. We need to accept the Endangerment Finding and lead the change...there is simply too much at stake now. Bravo Earthjustice for highlighting this issue.
I really don't know why they are threatening to not pass this bill. It's mainly the Republican party that has this problem with it. I am 100% FOR this bill to be passed. Obviously the Republicans do not want a change. Obama wants change. He promised it. He's going to do it. There is more CO2 in the air than there is for Oxygen. Because we keep tearing down trees and not growing new ones. Proves the human race neglects their own planet. What Obama is doing will help this world for sure. It also shows the Republican's negligance and how they don't care about the world or their country. I support the Democrats.
If CO2 is food for plants then why isn't Mars overgrown with plants? Mars consists of 96% of CO2. You know what else consists mainly of CO2? Rocks, graphite, diamonds and the gasform known to us all. Mars is to us mere rocks. What a striking coincidence. The equation may be of more importance than its ingredients. Any acceleration in becoming like Mars may be postponing the inevitable but no less worthwhile. I live in the EU. Last week a bill was passed that allowed US government acces to my bankaccount, this besides many other regulations that invaded personal privacy in name of battling terrorism. This decision was taken without any citizen aware of it. No matter what we as citizens said or voted against, it still gets pushed through... What makes you think we need a global government to own us all or that it's not already here? The world is too big to govern gloally and never has an empire with unwilling enforcements stood for long. I'm for an international environmental court, a tribunal if you will because when nothing gets done and major polluters can continue to do so, mass extinction, mass deaths, mass destruction will come from their hands. And what will they say then? "Ich habe das nicht gewusst?" "Only doing my job". Sure.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <ul> <li> <blockquote> <img> <br />

More information about formatting options