Let's Defend The Climate Change Bill

View Trip Van Noppen's blog posts
16 July 2009, 2:35 PM
Massive coal lobby threatens nation's chance for a clean energy future

The Senate, perhaps inadvertently, has given the American public a chance to help counter a massive assault by the fossil fuel industry on our nation's best hope to fight climate change and forge a clean energy future—the American Climate and Energy Security Act.

The mission of ACES is historic and essential: drive the transition to a clean energy economy with millions of new jobs and dramatically reduce carbon emissions to avert the worst impacts of climate change. It could enable the United States to play a powerful leadership role in global climate negotiations later this year.

But, though well intentioned, the legislation suffered at the hands of fossil fuel lobbyists in its passage through the House of Representatives, and even its champions acknowledge that some of the concessions in the bill may hamper its effectiveness. Now, in the Senate, it faces even more attacks on its integrity from lobbyists led by coal.

Fortunately, though, the Senate has postponed until September its consideration of ACES, giving time for citizens, the environmental community and President Barack Obama to join in the effort to defend and strengthen this legislation.

The stakes could not be higher. President Obama describes ACES as "a good start," but given the political realities it may be all we can expect on climate change for many years to come. That puts tremendous pressure on the president—and the environmental community—to get it right this time.

Earthjustice's biggest concern is a loophole that exempts coal-burning utilities from changing their ways for at least 15 years. This means that the nation's biggest single contributor to greenhouse gas emissions can keep on polluting—and expanding—even as other industries are forced to clamp down. As engineered by massive coal industry lobbying, the loophole "grandfathers" in the existing, dirtiest coal plants, making them exempt from C02 limits under the Clean Air Act. Forty-three new coal plants planned or being built in the next five years would escape the bill's performance standards.

The enormous giveaways extracted by the coal industry's well-heeled lobby will allow dirty coal plants to supply nearly half of our electricity through at least 2025 according to EPA. Yet to achieve the carbon reductions that are needed by mid-century, we must start building a new clean energy infrastructure now. With old coal dominating the power market for decades to come, we will not see the investment in renewable energy that is critical both to the creation of a vibrant green economy and preservation of the planet as we know it.

Coal knows that its historical role as king of electricity generation is at stake because it is the major driver of climate change. Its leaders understand that effective legislation must put us on a path to replacing coal. Given that, it's understandable why the industry is fighting so hard to gut ACES.

With a massive lobbying effort, coal has outspent, outhustled and outmuscled its environmental and clean energy competition. In the first two quarters this year, the coal mining industry spent $6.8 million on lobbying. Another $71 million was spent by utilities that mostly use coal. Natural gas—the second biggest electricity generator—spent only a fraction of coal's expenditure in the first quarter, and suddenly awoke last week, vowing to pour money into lobbying efforts to carve out its own concessions in the Senate bill.

All of this means that we in the environmental community must speak up and convince our senators that effective legislation cannot give coal a free pass and put the bill's effectiveness in jeopardy. Old coal plants should have a deadline to clean up or shut down, allowing our energy needs to be met by cleaner, prosperity-creating alternatives. This is the message that you can send now by going to a special action alert page Earthjustice has set up. I encourage you to take this action now.

But, President Obama also must act. He must use his bully pulpit to bring the nation and this planet into the debate. Now is the time for the strongest possible support from the White House and the strongest message from all of us. Nothing less is likely to offset the steady drumbeat of fossil fuel interests fighting to keep the status quo.

Comments

Given the state of American politics - lobbying and what not - it seems to me that the 'rest of the world', by which I mean the global environmental and policy community, would be well-advised to be pro-active and intervene pre-emptively so its voice is heard on the Hill as the ACES takes final shape. Ain't it more prudent to prevent the harm at the Hill than to cry over spilt milk at Copenhagen? ps: .......and I was blaming the Chinese for building coal plants at a frenetic pace!
[...] and my guess is that the outrage won't stop there. This story, coupled with the unprecedented lobbying efforts coming from industry, illuminates the contentious debate that this legislation has stoked. At [...]
Phasing out coal powered generating plants certainly is required. However, they are but a symptom of the problem which is a nation living far beyond its means. Per capita we use more energy than any other nation. This consumption is exacerbated by the fact we have the third largest population. Our economic "premise", largely endorsed by the public, is that we must have an expanding population with each member consuming ever more of increasingly limited resources including the "free" ones - air and water. As seen in the recent economic twist, such a model is not sustainable. Reducing our consumption would allow time for alternative sources of energy to demonstrate their value which, as the Germans and DOE Secretary Chu suggest, is much more potent than most realize. History suggests that this nation could reduce its energy consumption ~20% without major economic ramifications. That would largely require individuals taking some responsibility to reduce. While such reduction can be easily done, I see little will on the part of the American public to change their ways. Therefore, we need more electric generating plants.
I am not right or left. I am not wrong or right. We live within a circle. Therefor people with an angle must be confused. I care about pollution and people. Slow down on both or the world is doomed. Even a child knows that when their room is a mess they have to clean it up or takeover someone else's space. Mom will not stop the overly aggressive or the selfish short sighted children from invading the clean space of the rest of us like it or not that is our job.
While I agree we need much more to keep toxic emissions as low as possible, we have to be carefull not to technologically put the cart before the horse. It doesn't work well that way! First we need to develope the technology so its practical and economically sound, then develope the mandates. We (you) seem to always get that backwards in our (your) haste. You would think by now we would have developed solar to a viable, practical, cost effective level by now, if not nuclear fussion. Lacking viable alternatives, we need to improve what we have, rather than all adopt an Amish life style, tempting though that may be for some. Since coal is our principal energy resource we need to do what we can to improve on how this is utililzed since there is plenty of room for improvement and probably still be economically viable. Then when viable, bring on the new clean technology and new regs. As for anthropogenic global warming, while there is much unknown here, there is alot known and well established. Most of this points to natural repeated cycling causes related to solar forcing issues. Of perhaps of more concern though is that politics has impinged on our science converting it to politics as it always does. The bias demonstrated here is extrodinary and the facts are being fixed to effect the political policies. (Bush II ?) It's not just that the numbers don't add up, it's that the numbers are being apparently contrived, something easier to do with computer modeling used in the absence of complete and accurate science. The whole process seems corrupted. If we don't care about this (if true) we are in a more immediate threat. Check "Climate Change Revisited" before drawing too many hard conclusions.
I hardly think there is any discussion anymore about what the overwhelming majority of scientists agree on. its not for you to deny anymore. you just choose what you _want_ to believe in, what is easier for you. sure its easier to not think about it, to not do anything. (what about mercury pollution, lead and all other toxic levels going up and up in the waters around the world? is that cyclic too do you think? what about coral death? does corals that have been around millions of years die off every couple of hundred years and then just pop back to life again? ) solar power IS viable. it is massively implemented on private home scale to power plant size. as is wind power. there is no further need for research to determine that these sources are "viable". you just have to invest the money to build them. and if coal is so goddamn profitable and "viable", why does the taxpayers always have to pay for the investments in carbon capture technology for example? (as is happening in australia, spain, germany, sweden...) is it because the coal power companies wants to get better or is it because they want to make as much money as possible short-term and F everything else, including the planet and all children. they are clearly not going to take the responsibility. and reducing emissions doesnt necessitate living "amish" either. in sweden we have about 1/4 of the carbon emissions per capita compared to the US and almost exactly the same lifestyle. its only _slightly_ more effective and better regulated. but I guess you dont even want to hear how easy it is. Im not saying we couldnt do better as well. we could and we are going to. please wake up!
I have to congratulate Marla on her steadfast adherence to arguments against climate change. Also, I'd hate to be in her shoes -- having to read these lefty posts that disagree with her stand and then having to write just to take up space so that lefties will not forget she's there. I even hate having to read the few posts that represent right-wing ideas, let alone going to a blog I disagree with and spending my time there. It's not easy being a plant!
I feel like we're all kind of in the same boat here: fear. Some people are afraid of change and losing their place of power in the coal industry, while others are afraid of losing the environment I really hope everyone can find it in their hearts to work together, have EVERYBODY face their fears and make real positive change. That being said, I do love our planet and all this coal business needs to stop.
It's amazing that coal can still be thought of as a viable fuel, when it is the cause of so much lung illness. We must impress upon Congress that coal is not the way to go!!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.